I did it! I was able
to complete my first over the shoulder miscue analysis (OTSMA). Even though I
found it to be somewhat challenging, it was not nearly as difficult, or as time
consuming, as the formal miscue analysis that I had to conduct last year. I think
that teachers could always use more hours in the day for numerous tasks
(teaching lessons, correcting papers, conferencing with individual students,
etc.). According to the article, Inviting Reflection on Reading through Over
the Shoulder Miscue Analysis by
Ruth Davenport and Carol Lauritzen, “Over the Shoulder has slowed us down and
encouraged us to pause within the busy life of the classroom to carefully
consider what has been revealed about a child’s reading and what has occurred
during the reading conference.” I believe that the OTSMA is something that I
definitely see myself doing more often than a formal miscue based on the class
readings and my own personal experience with it.
I decided to do my
OTSMA with a third grade student in my practicum classroom. Due to the bad
weather, which caused late starts and school cancellations, I was not able to
meet with this student beforehand as much as I would have wanted to. As
pre-service elementary teachers, however, we are taught to be flexible and to work
with what you have. That is what I had to do in this situation. The reader that
I met with is a female and slightly struggles with reading. She still loves to
read on a daily basis for fun, however, which is something that we want to see!
My student and I decided to use the chapter book that she was already reading, What
a Year by Tomie dePaola, for
the OTSMA. From this miscue activity alone, I was able to observe the
individual student read a large chunk of her book in just one sitting.
This experience alone has taught me a
lot about the individual reader. Since the Over the Shoulder has less
observational writing/data, I was able to focus my attention to where it was
truly needed, the student! During
and after the reading, I effectively communicated with my participant and
pinpointed what strategies she was using and things that we could work on. For
instance, from this miscue analysis I learned that my student uses all three
cueing systems as she reads (syntax, graphophonics and semantic) but could definitely
work on her use of semantics to construct better meaning from the text. Even
the student’s retelling was very important, because I was able to note what she
was focusing her attention on, I noted in my recordings (template D) that I
would create mini-lessons that focused on semantic cues (such as having the
student fill in the appropriate words that have been omitted from a sentence).
The next time that I
do a OTSMA I will make sure to gather more background information on the
student that I am working with. I felt that I had to go into this meeting with
little knowledge on the student that I was working with, which made the entire
process that much harder. In my prior blog posts, I have said a couple of times
the importance of getting to know your students as learners and individuals, so
that you as a teacher can design lessons and activities that will help all of
your students grow appropriately. I would also select a book that had more
pictures in it. The book that my student read did not have as many
illustrations that I wanted, so I wonder how much of an impact it had on my
student and their reading process.
